A federal judge stated, in August 2006, that the tobacco companies were taking part in racketeering activities stating that the industry had colluded in a decades-long conspiracy to cover upto disguise the dangers of smoking from their customers. Tobacco manufacturers were ordered to broadcast newspaper adverts revealing smoking’s health effects.

The judge pointed out that the conspiracy dated as far back as 1953 when an assembly of tobacco manufacturers gathered at New York City's Plaza Hotel and agreed upon a public relations stunt to ward off health concerns attributed to smoking. The judge also ruled that even after the 1964 Surgeon General’s report attributing smoking to lung cancer tobacco manufacturers continued to deny and calculatedly distorted numerous significant dangers of smoking their products.

It was also discovered that the tobacco companies marketed their products to youth groups, in spite of the manufacturers claims they do not want youths to smoke. The companies were discovered to be detecting youth habits and preferences, hence making sure that marketing and campaigns reached youth. The severe dangers of smoking were concealed from them while their young bodies were still developing.

The manufacturers were also faulted for opposing publicly that passive smoking is harmful.

In 1999, the Clinton administration blamed the tobacco companies of racketeering as some coordinated plan to deceive the public about the threats posed by smoking and to keep secret the knowledge they had to the contrary.

Under the decision the tobacco manufacturers were also ordered to stop using descriptions such as low tar, light, ultra light, mild or natural or any other depictions that might seem as if cigarettes posed less of a health hazard or an attempt to whitewash the dangers of smoking them.

While this ruling was a win for numerous anti-tobacco and anti-smoking campaigns, a number spoke about how long it took for the government to respond to tobacco in society and the length of time the case took too. Other people thought possibly the court wasn't punishing enough with the industry.

We are pleased with the court's finding of liability on the part of the defendants, but disappointed that the court did not impose all of the remedies sought by the government the Department of Justice stated in a written communication

Nevertheless, we are hopeful that the remedies that were imposed by the court can have a significant, positive impact on the health of the American public.

All in all, it seemed to a vast number to be a pointless win but still did some good in highlighting the genuine dangers of smoking that even the tobacco companies could not or was no longer approved to rebuff. 

Learn more about the dangers of smoking and how they can affect your health. Webmasters are also invited to use our quit smoking affiliate program.